Rahul v. State

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1043/2018 RAHUL ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Amrik Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP.

Mr.K.N.Singh, Advocate for the complainant.

SI Jai Bhagwan, PS Nihal Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 23.05.2018 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.76/2018 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at PS Nihal Vihar. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. 3.

Co-accused Narender has since been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 23.04.2018 in Bail Appln. 637/2018. The nature of injuries sustained by the victim is 'simple'. There is delay of seven days in lodging the FIR.

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be

released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

5.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

MAY 23, 2018 / tr