Satish Chand Singhal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi

$~29 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1123/2012 SATISH CHAND SINGHAL ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

O R D E R

% 31.05.2016 1.

None appears for the parties.

2.

Order-sheet would show that though the writ petition was admitted but no stay was granted meaning thereby proceedings have continued before the learned Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.

The petitioner is challenging a summoning order on a complaint filed by the Income-Tax authorities alleging that the petitioner has committed an offence punishable under Section 276C(1)/277 of the Income-Tax Act. 3.

The factual basis is falsification of the books of accounts to diminish income by `4,20,821/-.

4.

Since none appears for the petitioner to argue the writ petition the same is dismissed in default.

5.

No costs.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

MAY 31, 2016/skb