Pci Limited v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 140/2016 PCI LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, Advocate.

versus DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

O R D E R

% 18.10.2016

1. None appears for the Respondent.

2. Subject to the Petitioner filing a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within four weeks seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator, the statement made by learned counsel for the Respondent on 24th August, 2015 will continue to operate till such time the Arbitrator so appointed passes an order in an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in accordance with law.

3. The petition is disposed of.

S. MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 18, 2016 Rm