Sushil Kumar v. State ( Delhi Administration)

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 859/2016 SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.M.P.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.Sidhant, Advocate.

versus STATE ( DELHI ADMINISTRATION) ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.

Ms.Mumtaj, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person.

W/ASI Sushma, PS Uttam Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 23.05.2016 1.

Status report filed. It is taken on record.

2.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.272/2016 registered under Section 376 IPC at PS Uttam Nagar.

3.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 28.04.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then.

The prosecutrix is present along with her counsel. It is informed by them that the prosecutrix and the petitioner have since married and are living together. They have no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. BAIL APPLN. 859/2016

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

5.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J MAY 23, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 859/2016