Mohd.Shamim v. Arifa

$-53 and 54- *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P.

431/2012 & Crl.M.A 18241/2014 MOHD.SHAMIM Petitioner Through;

Father of the petitioner with counsel, versus ARIFA Respondent Through:

Respondent in person with Mr.Abhishek Raj, Adv.

+ CRL.REV.P. 661/2013 & Crl.M.A. Nos.17575/13,15606/14 MOHD. SHAMIN Petitioner Through:

Father of the petitioner with counsel versus ARIFA Respondent Through:

Respondent in person with Mr.Abhishek Raj, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

ORDER

% 23.05.2016 1.

Although, mediation report has not been received but counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the copy of the settlement, which fact has admitted by the respondent.

2.

Both the parties submit that they have agreed to comply with the terms and conditions of the settlement.

3.

In view of the settlement entered into between the parties, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn the revision petitions.

4.

Accordingly, both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. ^RAT]ffiHXT?TM[;J.

MAY 23, 2016/'neelam'

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.