← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1397/2016

Satender @ Gajender v. State

2016-05-24Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Pratibha Rani2 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1397/2016 SATENDER @ GAJENDER ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Dinesh Malik with Mr.Akash Saini, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.R.S.Kundu, A.S.C. for the State with Mr.Ankit Kumar, and Mr.Kranti Bhandari, Advocates with SI Niranjan Kumar, PS Bhajanpura.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 24.05.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months for the purpose of filing SLP and to re-establish social-ties with society and family members. 2.

Notice. Mr.R.S.Kundu, A.S.C. for the State accepts notice on behalf of State.

3.

Status report has been filed by the State which reads as under:- ".......... In this regard, an enquiry to verify the grounds, mentioned in the petitioner for seeking parole has been conducted. During the course of enquiry, given address of the petitioner has been visited. It is revealed that there are three children namely Subham@Arjun (17 yrs.), Shivani (12 yrs.) & Anjaly (10 yrs.) and one wife namely Kiran (32 yrs.) in the W.P.(CRL) 1397/2016

family of petitioner Satender. They are residing at S1/61 Kailash Nagar, P.S. Vrindawan, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, in a rented home for last three years. Kiran (wife of petitioner) stated that she has no own house and none of her children required getting admission in class 8th and 9th. She wants that her husband may not released on parole as he had already jumped parole and declared P.O. by the Hon'ble Court and was re-arrested on 27.02.2015."

4.

In view of the past conduct of the petitioner that he has availed parole from 22.09.2003 to 04.11.2003, but jumped the same and has been rearrested on 27.02.2015, request of the petitioner for grant of parole is rejected.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

6.

The petitioner be informed through concerned Jail Superintendent about the orders passed.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 24, 2016 'hkaur'

W.P.(CRL) 1397/2016