Technova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd. v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4915/2018 & CM APPL. 18968-18969/2018 TECHNOVA IMAGING SYSTEMS (P) LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Parthsharthi Jha & Mr.

Udit Jain, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Neeraj Chhabra, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4 Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shiraz C. Patodia, Mr. Ashish Singh, Ms. Juhi Chawla, Mr. Mayank Singhal & Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Advocates for respondent Nos.9 to 11 Ms. Reena Khair, Mr. Rajesh Sharma & Ms. Rita Jha, Advocates for respondent Nos.12 & 13 Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advocate for Kohli Graphics Systems Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jitendra Singh, Mr. Sharad Bhansali & Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.8

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 16.05.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and states that the petitioner has been advised

to move a representation before the Central Government. He states that the petitioner, if still aggrieved, may approach the Court. We take the statement on record and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the said statement. All the pending applications are also dismissed as withdrawn. This indulgence has been given, as the writ petition is at the initial stage and even notice has not been issued.

SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 16, 2018 tp