Naresh Chandila v. State & ANR.

23# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1147/2017 NARESH CHANDILA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms. Alka Singh and Mr.

Vaibhav Tomar, Advocates with petitioner in person.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Yogesh Kumar, PS Maya Puri.

Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 24.04.2017 By the present petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 497/2014 under Sections 341/323/506 IPC registered at PS Maya Puri, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter. Learned APP for the State on instructions submits that in the above noted FIR the petitioner is the only accused and the respondent No.2 the only complainant/victim.

Respondent No.2 is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel and the Investigating Officer. He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioner before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari CRL.M.C. 1147/2017

Courts on 17th September, 2016, copy whereof is annexed at pages 51-53 of the paper book. He further states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties he does not wish to pursue the above noted FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by learned counsel affirms the statement of respondent No. 2 and undertakes to abide by the terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts. To show remorse the petitioner undertakes to deposit cost as well.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No. 497/2014 under Sections 341/323/506 IPC registered at PS Maya Puri, Delhi and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed, subject to the petitioner depositing costs of ₹10,000/- with the Juvenile Justice Fund maintained by the Registrar General of this Court within four weeks.

Parties have signed the order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

APRIL 24, 2017/'vn'

CRL.M.C. 1147/2017