← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2318/2016

Harsha Vishal Kedia v. State ( NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

2017-03-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg3 pages

$-3, 9 & 14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 212/2017 KARISI4MA HIMANXU PALEJWALA & ORS Petitioners Through :

Mohd.Fazail Khan & Mr.Prakash K.Singh, Advocates along with petitioners in person.

versus Respondents Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with Insp.Anil Kumar.

Ms.Gayatri Nandwani, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person.

TI-IE STATE & ANR.

Through :

+ CRL.M.C. 2318/2016 & CRL.M.A.Nos.9700/16 & 9702/16 HARSHA VISHAL KEDIA Petitioner Through :

Mr.Arijit Majumdar, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Kamal K.Chei, APP with Insp.Anil Kumar.

Ms.Cayatri Nandwani, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person.

r AND + CRL.M.C. 3992/2016 D V KAPUR Petitioner Through Mr.Cagan Chhabra & Ms.Richa Narang, Advocates along with petitioner in person.

versus STATE & ANR.

Respondents CRL.M.C. 212/2017 & connected matters page lof3 By:AMULYA

Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with Insp.Anil Kumar.

Ms.Gayatri Nandwani, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE S.P.GARG

ORDER

% 23.03.2017 1.

The above referred petitions (CRL.M.C. 212/2017, CRL.M.C. 2318/2016 & CRL.M.C. 3992/2016) have been preferred by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.159/2013 registered under Sections 406/409/120B IPC at PS Economic Offences Wing. Status report is on record. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2 vide compromise deed dated 15.02.2016. 2.

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present with her counsel and has been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant if she has settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. She has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with her free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

3.

It is further informed that Crl.M.C. 1555/2016 was filed by Manish Radheshyam Malani for quashing of the instant FIR No.159/2013 and by an order dated 05.09.2016 of Co-ordinate Bench the said FIR was quashed against the petitioner therein. CRL.M.C. 212/2017 <6 connected matters

m'

4.

The petitioners' case is to be dealt with on the same footings. The petitions are supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of compromise deed dated 15.02.2016 has been placed on record. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No. 159/2013 registered under Sections 406/409/120B IPG at PS Economic Offences Wing and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners.

5.

The petitioners are directed to deposit ^ 20,000/- each petition as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

6.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Pending applications also stand disposed of.

^P.GARG, J.

MARCH 23, 2017/tr CRL.M.C. 212/2017 & connected matters