Ram Kumar v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~26 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 890/2016 RAM KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.K.Rai, Mr.Bharat Sharma, Mr.Satish Rathi & Ms.Lalita, Advocates.

versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP.

Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Advocate for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 27.04.2017 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.233/2016 registered under Sections 323/342/354/34 IPC at PS Fatehpur Beri. Status report is on record. 2.

I have heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP including learned Senior Counsel for the complainant and have examined the file.

By an order dated 03.05.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then.

3.

Petitioner is the father-in-law of the victim. Main allegations BAIL APPLN. 890/2016

are against Vikas (victim's husband) who has already been granted regular bail by the Court below. Victim's mother-in-law with similar allegations has also been granted anticipatory bail. 4.

Learned Senior Counsel for the complainant fairly did not oppose the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

6.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 27, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 890/2016