High Court of DelhiO.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/25/2017

Dayawanti Punj Model School v. Edu Smart Services Private Limited & ANR.

2017-05-12Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru1 pages

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 25/2017 DAYAWANTI PUNJ MODEL SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocate versus EDU SMART SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Narayanan and Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % 12.05.2017

O R D E R

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') inter alia, praying that the mandate of the Arbitrator appointed by the respondents be terminated. The petition is predicated on the basis that the arbitrator was appointed without concurrence of the petitioner.

2. In view of orders passed in a petition under Section 11 of the Act, being ARB.P. 204/2017, appointing an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties, the present application is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitrator appointed by the respondent (Sh.Arun Batta, Advocate) stands terminated.

3. The petition is disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 12, 2017 sm