Rajender Kumar v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1870/2016 & Crl.M.A.No. 7917/2016 RAJENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Nikita Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing counsel for BSES, RPL with Mr.

Arnav, Vidyarth, Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocates for respondent no.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 25.07.2017 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that petitioner has already paid the settled amount, therefore, the respondent No.2 has no objection in case FIR is quashed. In view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.2, FIR No.445/2014 under Section 135 Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 registered at P.S Sarita Vihar is quashed.

In view of the above, the petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as infructuous. Misc. applications is also disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J JULY 25, 2017 mw