Joginder v. State

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1483/2016 JOGINDER ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Nikhil Pillai, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with SI R.P.Yadav PS Vasant Kunj South

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 26.05.2016 1.

By filing the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking parole on the ground of taking care of his wife and infant child as well as for maintaining social ties.

2.

As per the nominal roll available on record, petitioner has already been granted furlough from 12th May, 2016 to 27th May, 2016 by the Director General of Prisons of Delhi.

3.

In view of the above, nothing further survives in this writ petition and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 26, 2016 'pg'