← Library
High Court of DelhiARB.P./331/2016

Savitri Vats & ANR. v. Subhkamna (Adverts) Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

2016-11-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru2 pages

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 331/2016 SAVITRI VATS & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Ms Richa Relhan, Ms Praneeta Sharma, Advocates.

Versus

SUBHKAMNA (ADVERTS) BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent Through:

Mr Sudeep Kumar Shrotriya, Mr Karan Sachdeva, Mr Varun Singh and Mr Prashant Chaudhary, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 08.11.2016 The learned counsel for the respondent states that there is no agreement between the petitioner and the respondent. He also drawn the attention of this Court to an affidavit filed in compliance of the order dated 05.10.2015 which unequivocally indicates that Subhkamna Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. and Subhkamna (Advert) Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. are two separate companies.

Indisputably, the agreement entered into by the petitioner is with Subhkamna Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at 197-E, PocketIV, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I. In the circumstances, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to

the petitioner to file afresh arraying Subhkamna Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. as a respondent.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 08, 2016 RK