Pawan Kumar v. State

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1181/2018 PAWAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP W/SI Amolak, PS Najafgarh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 01.08.2018 1.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.15/2017 initially under Section 363 IPC. Subsequently, Sections 342/506/34 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act have been added, Police station Najafgarh. 2.

It is informed by the learned APP that out of 12 witnesses, 7 have already been examined and only 5 witnesses who are official/formal witnesses are remaining.

3.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that this petition be disposed of with a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the completion of the trial. Accordingly, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the recording of the testimony of prosecution witnesses within a period of three months from the next date before the Trial Court. 4.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. 5.

Order Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 01, 2018/ns