← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2602/2018

Connect India Digital Pvt Ltd v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

2018-05-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$~89, 91 & 92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 15.05.2018 + CRL. M.C. 2602/2018 & Crl. M.A. 9225/2018 CONNECT INDIA DIGITAL PVT. LTD.

..... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + CRL. M.C. 2604/2018 & Crl. M.A. 9230/2018 M/S SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

..... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + CRL. M.C. 2594/2018 & Crl. M.A. 9210/2018 M/S AAA LANDMARK PVT. LTD.

..... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ishan Gaur, Adv..

For the Respondent(s) :

Mr. Ashish Dutta, Addl. PP for the State with SI Pawan Singh CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

15.05.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 9226/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 2602/2018, Crl. M.A. Crl. M.C. 2602/2018 & other connected matters

9231/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 2604/2018 & Crl. M.A. 9212/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 2594/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Crl. M.C. 2602/2018, Crl. M.C. 2604/2018 & Crl. M.C. 2594/2018 1.

The petitioners seeks quashing of similar orders all dated 25.04.2018 whereby the learned trial court has directed listing of the application of the petitioner filed under Section 102 of the Cr. P.C. along with the protest petition filed by the complainant challenging the closure report. The proceedings are listed tomorrow before the Trial Court for arguments. 2.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that the matter has earlier been listed twice and the same is not taken up for disposal. 3.

Keeping in view the fact that the closure report was filed and the application of the petitioners for release of the bank accounts has been pending since 03.01.2018, the trial court is directed to expeditiously dispose of the same in accordance with law.

4.

The petitions are disposed of in the above terms. It is clarified that the court has neither considered nor opined on the merits of the contentions of the parties.

5.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MAY 15, 2018 'rs'

Crl. M.C. 2602/2018 & other connected matters