High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/6441/2018

Ram Parsad Bismil v. The State NCT Of Delhi And ORS

2018-06-01Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Rekha Palli2 pages

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6441/2018 RAM PARSAD BISMIL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Adv.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Shobna Takair, Adv./GNCTD.

Counsel for respondents 1 to 3.

(appearance not given).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 01.06.2018 C.M. Nos.24752-53/2018 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6441/2018 Vide the present petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to cancel the order dated 26th February, 2016 passed by the SDM, whereby Sh. Rev Singh has been declared as Bhumidar of the land in question.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not, per se, aggrieved by the order dated 26th February, 2016 passed by the Revenue Assistant, declaring Sh. Rev Singh as Bhumidar, but since the aforesaid person is using the land in question for commercial purposes

instead of the agricultural purposes as mandated under the provisions of Delhi Reforms Act, the order dated 26th February, 2016 ought to be recalled. He submits that, despite the petitioner having made various complaints to the higher Revenue Authorities as also to the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, no action has been taken on any of his complaints. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3, who appears on advance notice submits that the petitioner has not made any complaint to respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has merely endorsed a copy of his complaint to the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi to the respondent No.2. However, she submits that instead of going into any technicalities, the respondents will examine the petitioner's aforesaid complaint and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within 12 weeks from today. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, it will be open to the petitioner to take legal recourse as permissible under the law. REKHA PALLI, J.

JUNE 01, 2018 neelam