High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./948/2016
Ram Prakash @ Prakash v. State Thr. Govt Of NCT
2016-11-15Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta1 pages
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 948/2016 RAM PRAKASH @ PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Represented by:
None versus STATE THR. GOVT OF NCT ..... Respondent Represented by:
Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Sachin Mann PS S.P. Badli.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 15.11.2016 Even on pass-over none is present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP on instructions submits that out of the three witnesses that remained to be examined two have been examined in chief. Thus the trial is at the fag end. This may be the reason for non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
NOVEMBER 15, 2016 'ga'