Pawan Kumar v. State
$-4 to 6,- *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 1140/2018 PA WAN KUMAR Petitioner Represented by: , Mr.Inderpal Kholdiar, Advocate versus STATE Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kuamr, PS Sultan Puri + BAIL APPLN. 1141/2018 KRISHNA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Inderpal Khokhar, Advocate versus STATE Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kuamr, PS Sultan Puri + BAIL APPLN. 1187/2018 RADHA GUPTA Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Deepak Anand, Mr.Rustam Singh, Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Aayushmaan V., Advocates versus THE STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kuamr, PS Sultan Puri BAIL APPLN. 1140/2018 & conn.matters Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER
o/o 25.05.2018 1.
By these petition, the petitioners seek regular bail in case FIR No.620/2016 under Sections 420/467/468/471/448/34 IPG registered at PS Sultan Purl on the complaint of one Rajesh Kumar Gupta on the ground that parties have settled the matter vide compromise deed dated 22"^^ April, 2018.
2.
In the above-noted FIR, Rajesh Kumar Gupta alleged that he had purchased plot No.C-4/405, Sultan Puri, Delhi ad-measuring 25 square yards from Radha Gupta for a sum of ^12.5 lakhs. The possession and all original documents of the plot were handed over to him. All the three floors of the building were locked by him and he used to often go to see the property. Later he came to know that Radha had sold the property to Pawan Kumar. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that Krishna, mother of Pawan Kumar was a witness in the first sale-deed. It is thus alleged that in connivance with Krishna and Pawan Kumar, Radha re-sold the property to Pawan Kumar. The petitioners are in custody for nearly 3 months now. The complainant is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer.
He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioners vide the settlement deed dated 22 April, 2018 pursuant whereto the parties i.e. Radha Gupta, Pawan Kumar and Krishna have all relinquished their claims on the property and he is now the owner and in possession of the property bearing No.C-4/405, Sultan Puri adBAIL APPLN.
a measuring 25 square yards.
3.
In view of the fact that parties have entered into a settlement, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioners be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ?
10,000/- each with one surety bond each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial, Court further subject to the condition that in case of change of residential address, the same will be intimated to the learned Trial Court.
4.
Petitions are disposed of.
5.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 25, 2018 mamta BAIL APPLN. 1140/2018 & conn.maiters