Jawahar Lal Arya & ORS v. The State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

I Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$'-3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1501/2016 JAWAHAR LAL ARYA & ORS Petitioners Through Ms. Tanuja Mahajan, Adv.

versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms. Megha Behi, Adv. and SI Ram Pratap, P.S.

Rajinder Nagar, Delhi alongwith respondent no.2 in person.

rn AND + W.P.(CRL) 1839/2016 POOJA SHARMA & ORS Through Petitioner Mr.(appearance not given) versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .... Respondents Through SI Ram Pratap, P.S. Rajinder Nagar, Delhi.

Ms. Tanuja Mahajan, Adv. for R-2 alongwith respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 15.09.2017 Petitioners and private respondents have prayed for quashing of the following cross FIRs:-

(a) FIR No. 551/2015 under Sections 356/379/354/323/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Rajinder Nagar on the complaint of respondent no.2 Dr. Pooja Sharma in W.P.(Crl.)No. 1501/2016. (b) FIR No. 599/2015 under Sections 323/506/34/354 IPC registered at Police Station Rajinder Nagar on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Ruchi Arya in W.P.(Crl.) No. 1839/20 16.

It is submitted that petitioners and private respondents have settled their disputes amicably before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi on 17th December, 2015. It is not in dispute that petitioners and respondents were neighbours. A quarrel ensued between them on some trivial issue resulting in registration of the aforesaid cross FIRs. Private respondents in both the petitions are present in Court and have been identified by SI Ram Pratap, Police Station Rajinder Nagar. It is submitted that they have settled their disputes amicably with the accused persons in the respective FIRs of their own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. They said they have no objection in case the abovenoted FIRs are quashed.

Petitioner no.2 in W.P.(Crl.) 1501/2016 who is respondent no.2 in W.P.(Crl.) 1839/2016 has paid Rs.1 lac to respondent no.2 in W.P.(Crl.)