Abdul Khalid v. The State

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 938/2016 ABDUL KHALID ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.F.Haq, Advocate.

versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with ASI Onkar Singh, PS T.Pur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 11.11.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.187/2016 registered under Sections 452/380/411/34 IPC at PS Timarpur. Status report is on record. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 09.05.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. Main allegations are against the co-accused. Petitioner's involvement to be the main conspirator has emerged only in the disclosure statement of co-accused.

Nothing has been recovered or discovered pursuant to the disclosure statement. 3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the BAIL APPLN. 938/2016

petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J.

NOVEMBER 11, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 938/2016