← Library
High Court of DelhiITA/396/2016

Commissioner Of Income Tax -Xi v. Amit Malhotra

2016-07-26Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri2 pages

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1.

+ ITA 396/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.

versus AMIT MALHOTRA ..... Respondent

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 26.07.2016 CM No. 25307/2016 (for condonation of delay of 510 days in re-filing the appeal)

1. There is an inordinate delay of 510 days in re-filing the appeal.

2. The Court finds that the standard excuse that the department is putting forth in all such applications for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal is two-fold. The first is regarding the practice directions issued by the Court pertaining to filing of soft copies of the paperbooks in tax matters. The second is regarding the change of standing counsel.

3. As regards the first ground, sufficient advance notice had been given to the litigants and Advocates about the filing of soft copies of the paperbooks. ITA No. 396 of 2016

Further, the Registry of the Court had made appropriate arrangements for scanning services at the filing counters to facilitate the making of soft copies so that the inconvenience if any caused to the Advocates and the litigants is minimised. In any event the change could not have entailed a delay of more than one and a half years.

4. As regards the change of Standing counsel for the Department, this again, does not impress the Court. It is not possible to accept that no one followed up on the filing of appeals and allowed a period of more than one and a half years to elapse before the appeal could be re-filed. The Department has a cell in the High Court which is under the supervision of a Deputy CIT. He ought to be keeping track of the filing of appeals and should be able to know if any appeal entrusted to the panel counsel for filing has not been listed even once before the Court for a long time.

5. The application for condonation of the delay of 510 days in re-filing the appeal is dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J JULY 26, 2016/dn ITA No. 396 of 2016