Vikas v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~21to 24 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3633/2015 VIKAS Petitioner Through:

MrJashandeep Singh, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr.Dhirendra Yadav, Advocate for R-I/UOI.

Ms.Anjana Gosain and Mr.Amab Naskar, Advocates for GNCTD.

AND p + W.P.(C) 3040/2015 and C.M.No.5433/2015 VIKAS THAKRAN .

Petitioner Through:

Mr.Raj Kr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil Kumar, Advocates.

versus GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.Ferida Satarawala, Advocate for GNCTD.

AND + W.P.(C) 3043/2015 and C.M.No.5436/2015 MOHAN LAL Petitioner Through:

Mr.Raj Kr.Sherawat withMr.Sushil Kumar, Advocates.

versus GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

AND + W.P.(C) 3044/2015 and C.M.No.5438/2015 BIJENDER SINGH Petitioner Through:

Mr.Raj Kr.Sherawat with Mr.Sushil Kumar, Advocates.

versus GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.Bandana Shukla for Ms.Ruchi Sindhawani, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

ORDER

% 30.04.2015 After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners seek leave to withdraw these Writ Petitions with liberty to challenge the letter dated 15.11.2010 issued by the Regional Transport Authority, Agra whereby the said Authority has taken a decision that all the 81 licenses were fake licenses.

Reserving the said liberty to challenge the legality of the said letter issued by the Assistant Divisional Transport Officer of Regional Transport Office, Agra Region, the present Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

7Liberty is also given to the petitioners that if they succeed in their challenge to the letter dated 15.11.2010, then all other legal remedies shall remain available to them.

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J TA, J APRIL 30,2015 'dc'