Shri Vikas v. Suman

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 487/2018 & CRL.M.A.10300/2018 SHRI VIKAS ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv.

versus SUMAN ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 13.11.2018 1.

The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned order dated 22.3.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka in MT No.253/2017, wherein it was directed that, as a token of ad interim measure, the respondent (petitioner herein) would pay at least Rs.2,00,000/- to the petitioner (respondent herein), which will be without prejudice to rights and contentions of the petitioner herein. It was further held in the impugned order that out of the said amount of Rs.2,00,000/-, the petitioner herein would deposit Rs.1,00,000/- in the bank account of the respondent herein within one month and the remaining amount of Rs.1,00,000/- one month thereafter and would produce deposit receipts.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already paid a sum of Rs.50,000/-, in compliance of the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- with the Trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the respondent is working as a PGT teacher in a school and they have got the proof in that regard, which the petitioner will prove at the time of evidence. Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the plea and submitted that the petitioner should comply with the order dated 22.3.2018. Learned counsel for the respondent further submitted that the respondent would be satisfied if a sum of Rs.50,000/- is paid by the petitioner to the respondent before the Trial Court within one month and the balance amount may be kept in a fixed deposit.

3.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petition is disposed of, as prayed, with direction to the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the respondent in cash, within one month, before the Trial Court and the balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- shall be kept in a fixed deposit in an auto renewal mode in the Trial Court, subject to the outcome of the petition pending before the Trial Court. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on

the merits of the case.

4.

The parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 22.11.2018.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J NOVEMBER 13, 2018 tp