Sarvadaman Singh Oberoi v. The Union Of India & ORS
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 306/2018 SARVADAMAN SINGH OBEROI ..... Appellant Through:
Appellant in person.
versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 12.10.2018 1.
The appellant in person has filed this appeal against order dated May 07, 2018 and May 15, 2018 passed in TR.P.(Crl.) 24/2018 and CRL.M.A. No. 9241/2018 in TR.P.(Crl.) 24/2018 respectively by the learned Single Bench of this Court.
2.
By order dated May 07, 2018, the learned Single Bench has observed that merely on the basis of 'bias' alleged the case in question cannot be transferred and dismissed the transfer application of the appellant / petitioner.
3.
By order dated May 15, 2018 the learned Single Bench has disposed of the application of the appellant / petitioner with the observation that the application to place on record certain documents and to list the matter before
the Registrar General of this Court cannot be considered, as no matter is pending before this Court, with liberty to produce the documents before the Court concerned as per law.
4.
Today before us, the notification being F.6/13/2011Judl./Suptlaw/721-725 dated June 14, 2011, constituting the Special Court of Additional Sessions Judge 01 in each District as Human Rights Court, is being challenged by the appellant in person.
The appellant is required to challenge the notification in an appropriate proceeding and not in this appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent.
5.
The order of the learned Single Bench dated May 07, 2018 and May 15, 2018, in our considered view, do not call for interference. 6.
However, in case the appellant feels that the Special Court has been constituted in violation of the provision of the Human Rights Act, the appellant is at liberty to challenge the said notification in accordance with law.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J OCTOBER 12, 2018/aky