Kalkaji Extension Residents Welfare Asso. v. M.C.D.

$~27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 5770/2012 KALKAJI EXTENSION RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSO.

..... Petitioner Through None versus M.C.D.

..... Respondent Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for SDMC.

Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocate for Mr.

Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC, GNCTD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 27.09.2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioner association. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD/respondent No. 1 states that, the relief prayed for in the present writ petition has been satisfied, inasmuch as, the subject park situated in Block-3 & 4, Kalkaji Extension, New Delhi, has already been denotified and in terms of the said denotification, the subject park shall not be permitted to be used for social functions, marriages etc., henceforth. Be that as it may, since none appears on behalf of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 RS