← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2833/2018

Kuldeep & ORS v. The State (NCT Of Delhi)& ANR

2018-05-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva3 pages

$~111 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2833/2018 KULDEEP & ORS ..... Petitioners Through :

Mr Naveen Saini and Mr Utsav Saini, Advocates.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through :

Mr Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State.

SI Ranbir Singh, PS Nangloi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 23.05.2018 1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.921/2015 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC, Police Station Nangloi, based on a Settlement. 2.

Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel which took place with regard to loaning and repayment of money. Parties are neighbours and had monetary transactions between themselves. The nature of injuries sustained in the quarrel is simple. 3.

Parties have settled their disputes.

Compromise Deed dated 26.04.2018 has been executed between the parties.

4.

It is stated by petitioners as well as respondent No.2, who are present in Court in person, that the entire amount payable by respondent No.2 has already been paid and received by the petitioner and the original title deed of the property of respondent No.2 has been handed over to respondent No.2.

5.

The petitioner as well as respondent No.2 submit that they have no other remaining liability against each other. All dues have been fully and finally settled.

6.

The Settlement records that the dispute occurred on the spur of the moment and now the parties have agreed to amicably settle their disputes with a view to restore peace and harmony between them. 7.

Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person, identified by the Investigating Officer. He confirms that they he has arrived at a Settlement with a view to maintain peace and harmony between the parties and further submits that he does not wish to press his complaint any further.

8.

In view of the above and keeping in view of the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute with a view to restore peace and harmony between them and Compromise Deed dated 26.04.2018 has been executed between the parties and all dues have been fully and finally settled and further respondent No.2 does not wish to press his complaint any further other, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored;

securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

9.

Accordingly, FIR No.921/2015 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC, Police Station Nangloi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to the petitioners depositing costs of Rs.20,000/- in total, which shall be paid to the ""Delhi High Court Advocates Welfare Trust", within a period of three weeks from today. Receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of four weeks from today.

10.

Order Dasti under signatures of Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MAY 23, 2018 'Sn'