Sh. Kuldeep Singh v. Government Of NCT Of Delhi
VI $-5, 6 & 7 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 5619/2018 & CM 21926/2018 + W.P.(C) 5622/2018 & CM 21936/2018 + W.P.(C) 5810/2018 & CM 22575/2018 SH. MANJEET SINGH SH. KULDEEP SINGH PARDEEP Petitioners Through:
Mr. R.S.Tomar and Mr. Sumit, Advocates versus GOVERNEMNT OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through:
Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
% 28.08.2018 In the above captioned three petitions, separate orders of even date 9^^ April, 2015 are impugned and so, arguments in these three petitions have been heard separately but for convenience sake, these three petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
In these petitions, rejection of petitioners' applications for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land, is challenged on the ground that their entire land has been acquired. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the copy of common impugned Award of 29^*^ October, 2004 (Annexure P-6), which reveals that the subject land i.e. Khasra No. 3/15 Min has been acquired in its W.P.(C) 5619/2018 ~ Pagel W.P.(C) 5622/2018 W.P.(C) 5810/2018 By:AMULYA
entirety. This is so reflected in the chart in the aforesaid Award showing apportionment of the compensation in respect of the subject land. An additional affidavit has been also filed on behalf of petitioners to this effect. So far as delay aspect is concerned, the petitioners can always be put to terms.
Accordingly, the impugned orders of 9^*^ April, 2015, are set aside subject to cost of ?40,000/- each to be deposited with the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund within a period of three weeks. Receipt of deposit of cost be furnished to respondent, who shall reconsider petitioners' application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land afresh within a period of twelve weeks thereafter, and the fate of the applications so reconsidered, be made known to petitioners within two weeks thereof, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.
With aforesaid directions, these three petitions and the applications are disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE AUGUST 28,2018 V W.P.(C) 5619/2018 W.P.(C) 5622/2018 W.P.(C) 5810/2018