Sachin S Jain v. Madan Mohan Mittal & ORS

$~34 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO 428/2011 SACHIN S JAIN ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Umesh Mishra and Mr. Sunil Kumar Ojha, Advocates versus MADAN MOHAN MITTAL & ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Chander Shekhar Patney and Ms. Anushree Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 13.07.2016 C.M.24444/2016 By way of this application, appellant's counsel seeks permission to withdraw the main appeal.

Upon notice of this application, learned counsel for respondent submits that he has no objection to this application. It is stated by learned counsel for appellant on instructions that an out of court settlement has been arrived at between the parties and an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC is already pending before the trial court. In view of the above, the present application is allowed and appellant's counsel is permitted to withdraw this appeal. The application is disposed of.

FAO 428/2011

FAO 428/2011 In view of the order passed in C.M. 24444/2016, this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

SUNIL GAUR, J JULY 13, 2016 s FAO 428/2011