← Library
High Court of DelhiRC.REV./263/2018

Sheila Gujral & ANR v. Joban Kaur Puri

2019-09-20Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC. REV. 263/2018 SHEILA GUJRAL & ANR .......Petitioners Through:

Mr. Aditya Das, Adv. with Mr. Vishal Gujral, petitioner no.2 in person.

Versus

JOBAN KAUR PURI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Akshay Makhija and Ms. Seerat Deep, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 09.06.2020 (Video Conference Hearing) CM APPL. 12058/2020 (Exemption) It is an application seeking exemption from filing legible copies of the documents etc. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM APPL. 12059/2020 (Exemption) It is an application seeking exemption from filing attested affidavits etc. Allowed with the stipulation that the requisite affidavits shall be placed on record within the time prayed for.

CM APPL. 12060/2020 (Exemption) It is an application seeking exemption from filing court fee. Allowed with the stipulation that the requisite court fee shall be filed within 07 days of the resumption of the regular functioning of the Court. Application stands disposed of accordingly.

CM APPL. 12057/2020 in RC. REV. 263/2018 Heard.

During the course of hearing, Mr. Das, ld. counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from petitioner no.2 - Mr. Vishal Gujral - present during the hearing, states that there are no dues outstanding for the use and occupation of the subject premises for the months of April and May, 2020 inasmuch as the same were cleared on 06.06.2020. As regards the liability towards GST, Mr. Das, ld. counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the accounts of the non-applicants he represents, the outstanding liability towards GST is only about Rs.2,30,500/- and that, on the reconciliation of the accounts, any of the outstanding liability towards GST shall be cleared within two weeks. In view of the submissions made by Mr. Das, Mr. Makhija, ld.

counsel for the applicant - the respondent in the instant revision petition, does not press the instant petition with the liberty to approach the Executing Court for any of the defaults accruing a right to the applicant to proceed further for the execution proceedings. Let it be so. In view of the submissions made, the instant application stands disposed of accordingly.

A.K. CHAWLA, J JUNE 09, 2020 acm