Pankaj Mittal v. Union Of India

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 401/2018 PANKAJ MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Bhupesh Narula with Mr. Rinku Dhingra Narula and Ms. Prachi Prakash, Advs versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel Railways with Mr. Harsh Pandit, Adv and Mr. Sandeep Chawla, Office Supreritendent and Mr. Vinod Kumar, Senior Clerk

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 09.08.2018 1.

Mr. J.K. Singh, who, appears for the respondent has returned with Instructions.

2.

Learned counsel says that Mr. Vinod Kumar Bahamani (Mobile No.8527811411), who, is on the panel maintained by the respondent can be appointed as an Arbitrator in the matter. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he has also taken instructions, albeit, from Mr. Pankaj Mittal (i.e., his client) and that he has no objection to Mr. Vinod Kumar Bahamani being appointed as an Arbitrator in the matter.

ARB.P. 401/2018

4.

It is ordered accordingly.

5.

Counsel for the parties are also agreed that the seat of the arbitration will be Delhi.

6.

Learned Arbitrator will enter upon reference on or before 30.09.2018.

7.

The Arbitrator will issue a notice in this behalf in writing to the parties.

8.

Needless to say, both the parties will have right to put forth their claims and counter claims albeit in accordance with law. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AUGUST 09, 2018 c ARB.P. 401/2018