Aswini Kumar Goswami & ORS v. Union Of India & ORS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 29, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5929/2018 & CM 23151/2018 ASWINI KUMAR GOSWAMI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Manoj Gupta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Shalini Nair, Ms. Anjana Gosain and Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Advocates for respondent No.1 Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for respondents No.2, 4 to 8

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

(ORAL) 1.

Petitioners claim that they were given fixed term contract engagement as Assistant Controllers by third respondent-Air India Air Transport Services Limited (hereafter referred to as 'AIATSL') for a period of three years. Although the Fixed Term Contract Engagement Agreement (Annexure P-2 colly.) does not contain any clause for renewal, but petitioners' counsel asserts that petitioners' aforesaid Contract has been renewed from time to time and the last renewal was on 15th March, 2018 for a period of three months.

2.

It is pointed by petitioners' counsel that the transfer of contract from AIATSL to Air India was sought by petitioners in May, 2018, but there is no response to the said request for transfer of contract. W.P.(C) 5929/2018

3.

It is evident from Annexure P-3 that renewal of contract of Assistant Controllers for a period of one year was undertaken to await new terms and conditions of renewal.

4.

Upon hearing and on perusal of material on record, I find that the request for transfer of contract from AIATSL to Air India has been made by few of petitioners. It is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and the application with permission to petitioners to make individual applications seeking transfer of contract from AIATSL to Air India within a period of two weeks from today. If any such applications are received by fourth respondent from petitioners, then the same be considered as per the applicable rules and regulations within a period of four weeks and a speaking response on these applications be given by fourth respondent and the fate of these applications be conveyed to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

5.

With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE MAY 29, 2018 s W.P.(C) 5929/2018