Sunil Nagar v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS
$~47 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 979/2016 SUNIL NAGAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Anil Kr. Basoya, Adv.
versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP with SI D.V.
Singh, PS Lodhi Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R D E R
% 12.05.2016 Crl.M.A. 7817/2016 (Exemption) Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Bail Appln. 979/2016 Arguments heard.
The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.260/2015, under Sections 143/147/148/149/308/326/506/120-B IPC, Police Station Lodhi Colony.
As per FIR, the allegations levelled in the present case are that the complainant Pankaj Rathi was a student of Dayal Singh College, Lodhi Colony, New Delhi. On 25.07.2015, he and his friends were attacked by the petitioner and other co-accused persons Yashpal, Veer Pal Singh @ Preet, Tarun Chowdhary @ Tanu, Preet Inder Bir Singh,
Sachin Basoya, Umang Chowdhary, Punit, Rohit Chowdhary, Himanshu Bhati, Vishal Chowdhary and 15-20 boys. In the attack, the complainant and his friends received injuries on his person. It is specifically alleged that at the time of incident, the petitioner was carrying knife in his hand whereas co-accused Sachin Basoya was carrying danda and a pistol like object.
There are serious allegations against the petitioner that without provocation, he along with his associates caused injuries on the person of the complainant and others. It is also specifically alleged against the petitioner that he was carrying knife in his hand at the time of incident. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature that he was part of the unlawful assembly and caused injuries to the complainant and others.
In the facts and circumstances, no ground is made out to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Application is accordingly dismissed.
P.S.TEJI, J MAY 12, 2016 dd