Sachin Basoya v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS
$~45 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 976/2016 SACHIN BASOYA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Anil Kr.Basoya, Adv.
versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP with SI D.V.
Singh, PS Lodhi Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R D E R
% 12.05.2016 Crl.M.A. 7814/2016 (Exemption) Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Bail Appln. 976/2016 Arguments heard.
The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.260/2015, under Sections 143/147/148/149/308/326/506/120-B IPC, Police Station Lodhi Colony.
As per FIR, the allegations levelled in the present case are that the complainant Pankaj Rathi was a student of Dayal Singh College, Lodhi Colony, New Delhi. On 25.07.2015, he and his friends were attacked by the petitioner Sachin Basoya and other co-accused persons Yashpal, Veer Pal Singh @ Preet, Tarun Chowdhary @ Tanu,
Preet Inder Bir Singh, Sunil Nagar, Umang Chowdhary, Punit, Rohit Chowdhary, Himanshu Bhati, Vishal Chowdhary and 15-20 boys. In the attack, the complainant and his friends received injuries on his person.
It is specifically alleged that at the time of incident, the petitioner was carrying danda and a pistol like object, whereas coaccused Sunil Nagar was carrying knife in his hand. There are serious allegations against the petitioner that without provocation, he along with his associates caused injuries on the person of the complainant and others. It is also specifically alleged against the petitioner that he was having a deadly weapon at the time of incident. Apart from that, it is matter of record that anticipatory bail application of the petitioner has already been dismissed by this Court on 13.10.2015 and 30.10.2015 in Bail Application nos.2200/2015 and 2351/2015 respectively.
In the facts and circumstances, no ground is made out to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Application is accordingly dismissed.
P.S.TEJI, J MAY 12, 2016 dd