← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1143/2016

Mohd. Yaseen v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

2016-12-16Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta2 pages

$~1&26 * ESf THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1143/2016 Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Vemra, Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Ms. Neha, Advs.

MOHD. YASEEN Represented by:

versus Respondent Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp. Satish Kumar PS Bhalswa Dairy.

STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Represented by:

BAIL APPLN. 1135/2016 + Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Vemra, Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Ms. Neha, Advs.

CHAMANBHAI Represented by:

versus Respondent Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp. Satish Kumar PS Bhalswa Dairy.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA STATE ( NOT OF DELHI) Represented by:

ORDER

16.12.2016 % The petitioners are facing trial in case FIR No. 56/2013 under Sections 302/201/34 IPG registered at PS Bhalswa Dairy. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with his nephew committed the murder of his daughter Reshma and drowned the body in the Boat Club. No missing report was lodged by the petitioner and BAIL APPLNs, 1143/2016 & 1135/2016 By:AMULYA

the FIR was registered only after a body was found at the Boat Club with a stone tied with the help of a shawl wrapped on the body. During the course of investigation statements of witnesses of last seen were recorded. During trial all the six public/ material witnesses have been examined and now only 15 formal witnesses remain to be examined. On a query raised, learned APP on instructions submit that the DNA profiling of the deceased could not reveal her identity as the same was putrified. Thus the only circumstance against the petitioner Mohd. Yaseen and his nephew Chaman Bhai at this stage is that they did not lodge a missing report of the girl, though she was not available at the residence for a long time.

Be that as it may, without commenting on the fact whether the same is sufficient to convict the petitioners for the offence of murder or not, it is sufficient to note that the petitioners have been in custody for more than three years and all material witnesses have been examined. Considering the fact that the witnesses now to be examined are formal in nature, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners. It is therefore directed that the petitioners be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ?

1 lakh each with two sureties each of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, further subject to the condition that the petitioners will not leave the NCT of Delhi without the prior permission of the Court concerned and visit the concerned Police Station on the 1^^ Monday of every month at 4.00 PM.

Petitions are disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

DECEMBER 16,2016 /'ga'

BAIL APPLNs. 1143/2016 & 1135/2016