Sanofi India Ltd. And ANR. v. Union Of India And ORS.

$-51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30.5.2018 + W.P.(C) No.6102/2niS SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Through:

....Respondent Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr.

Prateek, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Sahil Sood and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs for UOI.

.i CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER. .T. rOR AT ) CM Appl. No.23697/2fl1S 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions ' i • W.P.(C) No.6102/2018 & CM ADpL Noii^^r^Qfi/^nis 2.

Vi Issue notice.

3.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.

4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.

5.

I am informed that the petitioner has field two review petitions against the impugned notifications dated 23.11.2017 and 28.12.2017. By:AMULYA W.P.(C) No.6096/2018 Pg.lqfl

- 6.

It IS not disputed before me by Ms. Acharya, learned ASG, that the review petitions are being heard by the respondents. 7.

To be noted that the two demand notices issued pursuant to the said aforesaid notifications are under challenge in the present writ petition.

8.

Having regard to the aforesaid fact and circumstances, counsel for the parties are agreed that the writ petition can be disposed of based on the following terms:

The official respondents will not take / (i) any coercive measures pending the disposal of the review petitions qua which hearing has already been granted.

(ii) In ease the determination in thcTeview petition is against the interest of the petitioner, it will not be enforced one week thereafter.

(iii) A copy of the decision taken in the. review petitions will be served on the petitioners; • • •: :'■ % 9.

Accordingly, pending application shall stand closed. f!

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J • ■.11 May 30, 2018/pmc W.P.(C) NO.6096/20IS Pg.2of2