High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1007/2016

Urmila v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

2016-07-14Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta1 pages

30#«&31#$ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAILAPPLN.

1002/2016 + RAGHUBIR SINGH , Petitioner Representedby:

Mr. RameshArora,Advocate.

versus Respondent Ms. RajniGupta,APP for the State with SI Asha Singh, PS Neb Sarai.

STATE(NOT OFDELHI) Representedby;

BAIL APPLN. 1007/2016 + Petitioner URMILA Representedby:

Mr. Ramesh Arora, Advocate.

versus STATE(NOTOFDELHI) Respondent Representedby:

Ms. RajniGupta,APP for the State with SI Asha Singh, PS Neb Sarai.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

14.07.2016 % Learnedproxycounselfor the petitionersstatesthatthe petitionershave beenarrestedand thusthe presentpetitionshave becomeinfructuous. LearnedAPP for the State supportsthe statementon instructionsfrom the InvestigatingOfficer. LearnedAPP furtherpoints out towards the status reportwhereinalso it has beenreflectedthatthe petitionershave beenarrested and are injudicial custody.

Petitions are dismissed as infmctuous.

MUKTA GUPT^T JULY 14,2016/'vn'

By:AMULYA