← Library
High Court of DelhiCS(COMM)/563/2016

Ssab Technology Ab And ANR v. Sanjay Jain And ANR

2017-05-11Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur2 pages

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 563/2016 SSAB TECHNOLOGY AB AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through:

Mr Prithvi Singh, Adv.

versus SANJAY JAIN AND ANR ..... Defendants Through:

Ms Prerna Arora, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 11.05.2017 I. A. No. 15206/2016 (U/O XXXIII Rule 3 CPC) This is an application filed by the parties duly supported by the affidavit of the constituted attorney of the plaintiff as also the affidavits of defendant Nos. 1 and 2. The terms of settlement are contained in the aforenoted application which along with affidavits of the parties as also the documents appended along with application (annexure A) will form collectively a part of Ex. P1. Parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions of Ex.P1.

After the aforenoted application had been filed, the parties in terms of the contents of Ex.P1 had agreed that a Local Commissioner be appointed to visit the premises of the defendant for the reasons as mentioned in the order dated 07.12.2016. Report of the Local Commissioner is now on record. As per this report, on inspection of the premises of defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and on seizure of 8 samples of so called impugned plates of the defendants had been seized and were

sent to the laboratory of the plaintiff for the purposes of testing. The reports of the laboratory of the plaintiff is also on record. This report suggests that the samples which had been seized were in fact genuine. Products and results from the chemical analysis, in fact, evidenced this genuineness of the said samples. This report is taken on record. Since the products of the defendants were found to be genuine, he is permitted to sell the same in the market.

The suit of the plaintiff is, accordingly, decreed in terms of Ex.P1.

Order dasti under the signature of the Court Master. I.A. Nos. 6213/2016 (u/O XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC) and 7894/2016 (u/O XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) The applications have become infructuous, accordingly, disposed of.

INDERMEET KAUR, J MAY 11, 2017 SU