Central Administrative Tribunal & ANR. v. Kuldeep Singh

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7744/2013 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. H. K. Gangwani, Advocate.

Versus

KULDEEP SINGH (through LRs) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. S. Sunil, Advocate.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 16.12.2019 C.M. APPLs. 53869/2019 & 53870/2019

1. For the reasons stated therein, the applications are allowed. The delay in filing the application is condoned and the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent are brought on record. The amended memo of parties is taken on record.

W.P.(C) 7744/2013

2. Considering that the Respondent has expired, the Court considers it appropriate to direct that the questions raised in the present petition be left open to be considered in an appropriate case. The impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal will not be construed as a precedent in any similar matter in future.

3. The petition is dismissed in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

DECEMBER 16, 2019 pa