Babli Mittal And ANR. v. Union Of India And ANR.

$-53 to 56 . ^ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 6146/2018 + NISHANT MALIK AND ORS.

....Petitioners Mr Manmohan , and Mr Manoj Sharma, Advocates.

Through:

versus ■ UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Through Respondents WITH W.P.(C) 6173/2018 + MAHHSH GARG Petitioner Through:

Mr Manmohan and Mr Manoj Sharma, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Through:

..... Respondents Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr Pawan Pathak, Advocates for UOI.

^4 WITH W.PTO 6282/2018 + • UMA SHANKAR ....Petitioner Through:

Mr Manmohan and Mr Manoj Sharma, Advocates.

versus Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

By:AMULYA

■TTHr Through:

Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr Pawan Pathak, Advocates for UOI.

AND W.PTQ 6293/2018 + BABLI MITTAL AND ANR.

Petitioners Through:

Mr Manmohan and Mr Manoj Sharma, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Through:

..... Respondents Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr Pawan Pathak, Advocates for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 07.12.2018 CM No. 51331/2018 in W.P.fCI 6146/2018 CM No. 51391/2018 in W.P.(CI 6173/2018 CM No. 51390/2018 in W.P.fO 6282/2018 CM No. 51392/2018 in W.P.(C) 6293/2018

1. ■ The petitioners have filed the present applications, inter alia, praying that they be permitted to withdraw the above captioned petitions with liberty to challenge the validity of certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The said applications are allowed and the above captioned petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Further hearings scheduled in these petitions are cancelled. 2.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J DECEMBER 07, 2018/MK