Suresh Velappan v. State & ANR

SHAKUN ANAND 28.01.2019 11:35 $~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1885/2016 and Crl.M.A.8022/2016, 941/2017, 11825/2017 SURESH VELAPPAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Maitreyee Mishra, & Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocates versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Pranav Sood, Mr. Vrinda Jhingan, Mr. Aakashi Lodha, Mr. Manish Jha, Mr. Akshat Gupta, & Mr. Sanjeevi Seshaoki, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for R-Jindal Power Ltd.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 15.01.2019 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the application filed therewith, reserving all the contentions in the petition to be raised as defences in the on-going trial before the criminal court.

CRL.M.C. 1885/2016

The learned senior counsel on the other hand submits that in view of this submission, he does not press the application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. The petition and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.

The petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions as defences in the trial.

The application filed under Section Cr.P.C.

by the respondent/complainant is disposed of as not pressed. R.K.GAUBA, J.

JANUARY 15, 2019 vk CRL.M.C. 1885/2016