Global Marketing Company Through Its Proprietor v. Principle Commissioner Of Customs (Import) & ANR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4488/2016 GLOBAL MARKETING COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ..... Petitioner Through Mr Umang Srivastava and Mr Piyush Kumar, Advocate.

versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) & ANR.

..... Respondent Through Mr Kamal Nijhawan, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr Sumit Gaur, Advocate for R1.

Mr Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for R2, DRI.

Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel for CUSTOM.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 18.05.2016 CM 18702/2016

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4488/2016

3. It is stated that the relied upon documents (RUDs) have not yet been supplied to the Petitioner and the non- RUDs have not been returned. If this W.P.(C) 4488/2016 Page 1 of 2

is correct then the Adjudicating Authority will supply the RUDs and return the non-RUDs to the Petitioner not later than four weeks from today.

4. Further, it would be open to the Petitioner to bring to the notice of the Adjudicating Authority the judgment dated 3rd May 2016 of this Court in W.P. (C) 441/2013 Mangli Impex Ltd v. Union of India within a period of ten days from today. If that is done, the Adjudicating Authority will give a decision on the question of his jurisdiction not later than four weeks thereafter, after giving the Petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

5. The writ petition is disposed of.

6. Order dasti.

S.MURALIDHAR, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 18, 2016 pkv W.P.(C) 4488/2016 Page 2 of 2