Rohit v. The State Of Delhi
$-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BAILAPPLN.
1072/2016 + ROHIT Petitioner Representedby;
None versus THE STATE OF DELHI Respondent Representedby:
Mr. HireinSharma,aPP with SI Ravi KumarPS S.B. Dairy.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTAGUPTA
ORDER
14.09.2016 Since 13" September,2016 was declaredaholidayvide notification No.2092/G-4/Genl./DHCthe matteris beingtakenup today. Presentnone forthepetitioner.
Learned APP for the State on instructionsfrom the investigating officer submits that the petitionerhas been granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
This appears to be the reason for nonappearanceon behalfof the petitioner. In view of the statementof learned APP for the State, petition is dismissed as infructuous.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 'ga'
By:AMULYA