Kamal Kumar And ANR. v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~33 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6318/2018 & CM APPL. 24274/2018 KAMAL KUMAR AND ANR.

..... Petitioners Through Mr Shambhu, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr Sushil K. Pandey, Advocate with Ms Neha Sharma, Advocate for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 18.12.2018 1.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh challenging the constitutional validity of Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013. 2.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The pending application stands disposed of.

3.

Order dasti.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J DECEMBER 18, 2018 pkv