Syed Khalid Akbar v. The Secretary-Pension Trust

$~13 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 5052/2016 SYED KHALID AKBAR ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus THE SECRETARY-PENSION TRUST ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, St. Counsel with Mr. Siddharth Nagpal, Advocate for Pension Trust.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 20.02.2017 1.

None appears for the petitioner.

No one appeared for the petitioner before the Registrar on 31.1.2017. On 31.1.2017, the Registrar passed the following order noting non-appearance of the petitioner on three earlier dates:- "There has been no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 29.09.2016, 19.10.2016 and 08.12.2016. Even today, there is no appearance on his behalf. No steps are being taken by the petitioner to serve respondent no. 2. Petitioner has also not filed any rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 despite opportunities.

Petitioner does not appear to be sincere in prosecuting the writ petition.

List the matter before the Hon'ble Court, for directions, on 20.02.2017."

W.P.(C) 5052/2016

2.

Since no one appears for the petitioner this writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J FEBRUARY 20, 2017 AK W.P.(C) 5052/2016