Amit Rai And ANR. v. Union Of India And ANR.

* VIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ^ y W.P.(0 6518/2018&CM Nos. 24926/2018&43254/2018 AMIT RAI AND ANR.

Petitioners Thi-ough;

Mr RajeevRanjan Pandey,Advocate, versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI.

AND 11.

+ / W.P.(0 6472/2018& CMNos. 24867/2018& 43256/2018 SUMITA SIRKER Petitioner Through:

Mr Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

% 29.10.2018 1.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the constitutional vires of Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013.

2.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

The pending appHcation is disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J OCTOBER 29, 2018/MK '\ \ • • By:AMULYA