High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2025/2016

Anish Kumar Singh v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

2016-09-01Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta2 pages

2# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2025/2016 ANISH KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Shashi Shekhar and Ms. Nupur Patodia, Advocates with petitioner in person.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Sharma, PS Vasant Kunj, North.

Mr. Nitish Ojha, Advocate for Mr. Narendra Singh Bisth, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 01.09.2016 Crl. M.A. No.8574/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 2025/2016 By the present petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 360/2013 under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC registered at PS Vasant Kunj North, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2 on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.

CRL.M.C. 2025/2016

Learned APP for the State on instructions from the Investigating Officer states that besides the petitioner there is no other accused and besides the respondent No.2 there is no other complainant or victim in the present FIR and no other person is involved.

The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Angira Dutt who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel states that she has settled the matter with the petitioner and in terms of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Petitioner, who is also present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel states that he will abide by the terms of settlement. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No. 360/2013 under Sections 354D/506/509 IPC registered at PS Vasant Kunj North, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

SEPTEMBER 01, 2016/'vn'

CRL.M.C. 2025/2016