Hema Dudhwala v. Hindustan Prefab Limited

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 941/2018 HEMA DUDHWALA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shaheen, Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate.

versus HINDUSTAN PREFAB LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocate with Mr. Ram Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 20.12.2018 I.A. 17353/2018 Present joint application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The same is duly signed by learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant as well as by the parties to the litigation. Present application is also supported by affidavits of the plaintiff and the defendant.

Both the learned counsel state that the matter has been compromised in accordance with the terms mentioned in the Settlement Application being I.A. 17353/2018.

Both the learned counsel state that the parties have already complied with the settlement terms mentioned in the aforesaid Settlement Application.

The aforesaid statements, assurances and undertakings given by learned counsel for the parties are accepted by this Court and parties are held bound by the same.

This Court has also perused the Settlement Application and is of the opinion that the same is lawful.

Consequently, the suit is decreed in accordance with the Settlement Application being I.A. 17353/2018, which is marked as Ex.C-1. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly. Registry is also directed to issue to the plaintiff a certificate authorizing her to receive back from the Collector half the amount of the Court fee paid by her in the present suit.

With the aforesaid observations, present application is allowed and the suit and all pending applications stand disposed of. The interim order dated 13th December, 2013 stands vacated.

MANMOHAN, J DECEMBER 20, 2018 js