Neeru Sehgal & ORS v. Tilak Raj Arora & ANR

$~31 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 279/2016 and I.A. No. 6918/2016 NEERU SEHGAL & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate.

versus TILAK RAJ ARORA & ANR ..... Defendants

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 30.05.2016 1.

In view of the fact that no details are given in the present suit, as required under Order 6 Rule 4 CPC, as to how the mother of the plaintiffs-Smt. Kanta Kumari was the owner of the suit property bearing Municipal No. CP-169, Maurya Enclave, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 and Smt. Kanta Kumari is stated to have died intestate, counsel for the plaintiffs seeks liberty to withdraw the suit so as to file a fresh suit thereby giving all necessary particulars of ownership of the mother-late Smt. Kanta Kumari by means of unimpeachable documents, including title documents so that plaintiff can claim share by partition to the property of the mother-late Smt. Kanta Kumari who has died intestate.

2.

Suit is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J MAY 30, 2016/AK