High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/4698/2016

Madhav Goel v. Delhi Jal Board & ANR

2017-03-10Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manmohan2 pages

21&22 • • *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C)4686/2016& CMAPPL..19552/2016 , HAMID HASAN Petitioner Through;Mr. SudhirNaagar,Advocatewith Mr^Rajat,Advocate.

versus DELHIJAL BOARD Respondent Through:Mr. SumeetPushkama,Advocatewith Mr, Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.

And + W.P.(C)4698/2016&CM APPL. 19582/2016 MADHAVGOEL .....Petitioner , Through;Mr. SudhirNaagar,Advocatewith Mr. Rajat, Advocate.

versus DELHIJAL BOARD& ANR .....Respondents Through;Mr. SumeetPushkama,Advocatewith Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

ORDER

o/o 10.03.2017 , Learned counsel, for respondent-DJB states that respondent shall decide the petitioners'representationsdated OS*^*^ May, 2016 in accordance By:AMULYA

with law and keeping in view the contentionsadvanced by the learned counsel for petitioners.

Keepingin view the aforesaid,presentwrit petitionsand applications are disposed of with a directionto respondentto decide the petitioners' representationsdated OS'" May, 2016 in accordancewith law by way of a reasonedorderafterkeepingin viewthe contentionsadvancedin the present proceedings.

However, it is clarifiedthat the interim protectiongranted by this Courtvide orderdated OS'^ June, 2016 shallcontinueto operatefor aperiod of two weeks after the disposal of the representationsby the respondentDJB. MANMOHAN, J MARCH 10,2017 js